Taiwan’s defense establishment has been conducting an argument with itself for most of the past decade about what kind of military it needs. On one side: advocates of conventional deterrence, who want advanced fighter aircraft, large surface combatants, and the visible symbols of military capability that signal to Beijing that Taiwan can fight and to Washington that Taiwan is a serious defense partner. On the other side: advocates of asymmetric or “porcupine” defense, who argue that Taiwan cannot match PLA conventional capability in a symmetric competition and that investing in high-cost platforms that the PLA can destroy on the ground before they are ever used is strategically incoherent.

Taiwan’s military has a personnel problem that its equipment purchases cannot solve. The active force — approximately 165,000 personnel across the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines — is designed for a conventional defense posture that the island’s strategic situation may not support. The reserve force, nominally numbering in the millions, is trained to a standard that multiple independent assessments have described as inadequate for the dispersed, mobile operations that Taiwan’s actual defense requirements would demand. The gap between the military on paper and the military that can fight is the most urgent operational readiness problem Taiwan faces, and it is one that requires sustained political will rather than procurement decisions to address.