<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts on Taiwan Strait</title>
    <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/posts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Posts on Taiwan Strait</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://taiwanstrait.com/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>1949: The Unfinished War and the Political Fiction That Has Governed the Strait Ever Since</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/1949-the-unfinished-war-and-the-political-fiction-that-has-governed-the-strait-ever-since/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/1949-the-unfinished-war-and-the-political-fiction-that-has-governed-the-strait-ever-since/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Taiwan question is a civil war outcome that was never formalized. When Chiang Kai-shek&amp;rsquo;s Nationalist forces retreated to Taiwan in 1949 following their defeat by Mao&amp;rsquo;s Communist forces on the mainland, neither side accepted the result as permanent. The People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China, proclaimed by Mao on October 1, 1949, claimed sovereignty over all Chinese territory including Taiwan. The Republic of China government, relocated to Taipei, continued to claim sovereignty over the mainland and to represent China in the United Nations until its expulsion in 1971. Both governments maintained, for decades, that there was one China and that they were its legitimate government. The dispute was not about whether Taiwan was Chinese. It was about which government was China&amp;rsquo;s.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1996: The Crisis That Shaped Everything That Came After</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/1996-the-crisis-that-shaped-everything-that-came-after/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/1996-the-crisis-that-shaped-everything-that-came-after/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In March 1996, the People&amp;rsquo;s Liberation Army conducted missile tests that bracketed Taiwan, splashing ballistic missiles into the sea north and south of the island in a demonstration designed to intimidate Taiwanese voters ahead of the island&amp;rsquo;s first direct presidential election. The Clinton administration responded by deploying two carrier battle groups to the region — the USS Independence and the USS Nimitz — in the largest American naval deployment in Asia since the Vietnam War. China backed down. The crisis ended without direct military confrontation. Its consequences have structured the strategic competition in the strait for the thirty years since.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Deterrence in the Western Pacific: What the US Navy Can and Cannot Do</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/american-deterrence-in-the-western-pacific-what-the-us-navy-can-and-cannot-do/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/american-deterrence-in-the-western-pacific-what-the-us-navy-can-and-cannot-do/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The United States has maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity toward Taiwan for more than four decades. It does not formally recognize Taiwan as an independent state. It does not provide a treaty guarantee equivalent to the commitments it has made to Japan, South Korea, or NATO allies. It does sell Taiwan defensive weapons under the Taiwan Relations Act, and it maintains unofficial relations through the American Institute in Taiwan. What it has not done is say explicitly and publicly whether it would use military force to defend Taiwan against a Chinese attack. This ambiguity has been the foundation of American cross-strait policy since 1979, and it has been under increasing strain as the military balance in the strait has shifted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australia&#39;s Taiwan Calculation: The Ally Closest to the Conflict That Least Wants to Name It</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/australias-taiwan-calculation-the-ally-closest-to-the-conflict-that-least-wants-to-name-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/australias-taiwan-calculation-the-ally-closest-to-the-conflict-that-least-wants-to-name-it/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Australia&amp;rsquo;s relationship with the Taiwan question is defined by a gap between its strategic reality and its public political language. The strategic reality is that Australia is a treaty ally of the United States, a member of the Five Eyes intelligence partnership, a signatory to AUKUS with its consequent nuclear submarine commitment, and a country whose trade relationships, geographic position, and alliance obligations make it impossible to remain neutral in a Taiwan Strait conflict that involves American military action. The public political language has been more cautious, with Australian leaders consistently declining to state explicitly what they would do in a Taiwan contingency, preferring instead formulations about supporting the peaceful resolution of the dispute and avoiding statements that could be read as provocation by Beijing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Below the Threshold: China&#39;s Gray Zone Campaign Against Taiwan</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/below-the-threshold-chinas-gray-zone-campaign-against-taiwan/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/below-the-threshold-chinas-gray-zone-campaign-against-taiwan/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China has been conducting a sustained campaign of pressure against Taiwan that falls below the threshold of armed attack and above the threshold of normal competitive statecraft. This gray zone — the space between peace and war where coercion operates through ambiguity, exhaustion, and the deliberate exploitation of thresholds — has been the primary arena of Chinese pressure on Taiwan for years and is the operating environment that Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s defense establishment spends more of its daily attention managing than any invasion scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China&#39;s Carriers: What the PLAN&#39;s Flatdecks Can and Cannot Do in a Taiwan Scenario</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/chinas-carriers-what-the-plans-flatdecks-can-and-cannot-do-in-a-taiwan-scenario/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/chinas-carriers-what-the-plans-flatdecks-can-and-cannot-do-in-a-taiwan-scenario/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;China&amp;rsquo;s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, underwent sea trials beginning in 2023 and has been advancing toward operational status. It is the first Chinese carrier equipped with electromagnetic aircraft launch system catapults — the same technology used on the American Gerald R. Ford class — which allows it to launch heavier aircraft with greater frequency than the ski-jump launch systems on China&amp;rsquo;s first two carriers, the Liaoning and the Shandong. The Fujian represents a genuine capability advance that brings Chinese carrier aviation meaningfully closer to the operational model that American carriers have perfected over decades. It does not bring the PLAN to American carrier aviation parity, and its operational utility in a Taiwan contingency is less straightforward than its physical characteristics suggest.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civil Defense: Whether Taiwan&#39;s Population Is Ready for What Its Military Is Preparing For</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/civil-defense-whether-taiwans-population-is-ready-for-what-its-military-is-preparing-for/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/civil-defense-whether-taiwans-population-is-ready-for-what-its-military-is-preparing-for/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ukraine&amp;rsquo;s experience since February 2022 has produced a global reassessment of what civil defense means in a modern conflict involving a large, technologically capable adversary striking civilian infrastructure. The Ukrainian example is relevant to Taiwan not because the two situations are identical — they are quite different in geography, military balance, and the specific threats each faces — but because Ukraine demonstrated that societal resilience, the willingness and capacity of a civilian population to sustain normal life and maintain government function under sustained attack, is a military asset of the first order. Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s civil defense posture, measured against the Ukrainian example, has been improving from a low base and remains inadequate for the scenario its military is preparing to fight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cognitive Warfare: China&#39;s Information Operations Against Taiwan&#39;s Will to Resist</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/cognitive-warfare-chinas-information-operations-against-taiwans-will-to-resist/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/cognitive-warfare-chinas-information-operations-against-taiwans-will-to-resist/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The most important battle in a Taiwan conflict may be fought before the first missile is launched, on platforms that do not appear in military order-of-battle assessments, by actors who are never uniformed and never identifiable. China&amp;rsquo;s information operations against Taiwan are not a supplement to its military strategy. They are the precondition for making the military strategy work. A Taiwanese population that has been sufficiently demoralized, divided, and confused about what is actually happening and who can be trusted is a population that provides less political support for resistance, less capacity for civil defense mobilization, and less coherent pressure on allied governments to intervene.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dispersing the Fabs: TSMC&#39;s Expansion Beyond Taiwan and Its Geopolitical Limits</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/dispersing-the-fabs-tsmcs-expansion-beyond-taiwan-and-its-geopolitical-limits/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/dispersing-the-fabs-tsmcs-expansion-beyond-taiwan-and-its-geopolitical-limits/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The political consensus that Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s concentration of advanced semiconductor production represents a strategic vulnerability has produced a global effort to disperse that production — or at least to replicate enough of it elsewhere that a Taiwan Strait crisis does not produce a complete collapse of advanced chip supply. TSMC is building fabs in Arizona, in Kumamoto and Hokkaido in Japan, and in Dresden, Germany. Intel is building in Ohio and Germany. Samsung is expanding in Texas. The CHIPS Act in the United States, the European Chips Act, and Japan&amp;rsquo;s semiconductor subsidy programs have collectively directed tens of billions of dollars at this dispersal objective. The effort is serious, expensive, and insufficient on the timescale that matters most.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Europe&#39;s Taiwan Problem: The Continent That Depends on the Outcome Without Shaping It</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/europes-taiwan-problem-the-continent-that-depends-on-the-outcome-without-shaping-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/europes-taiwan-problem-the-continent-that-depends-on-the-outcome-without-shaping-it/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;European governments have spent the past four years discovering that their economic exposure to Taiwan is larger and more structurally significant than their political frameworks were designed to address. The semiconductor dependency is the most acute dimension: European automotive manufacturers, industrial equipment producers, telecommunications companies, and defense systems contractors all depend on Taiwanese chip production for components that have no short-term European substitute. A Taiwan Strait conflict that disrupted semiconductor supply would hit European industry within weeks and would affect European defense procurement on timescales that matter for the continent&amp;rsquo;s own security.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fuel and the Island: Taiwan&#39;s Energy Vulnerability in a Conflict Scenario</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/fuel-and-the-island-taiwans-energy-vulnerability-in-a-conflict-scenario/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/fuel-and-the-island-taiwans-energy-vulnerability-in-a-conflict-scenario/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan generates electricity from a combination of natural gas, coal, nuclear, and renewables. It imports virtually all of its fossil fuels by sea. The natural gas arrives as LNG on specialized tankers that dock at regasification terminals on the island&amp;rsquo;s coasts. The coal arrives on bulk carriers. The oil arrives on tankers. Every BTU of hydrocarbon energy that Taiwan consumes has crossed the waters that surround it, and in a blockade scenario, every BTU of hydrocarbon energy that Taiwan consumes would come from reserve stocks that are being drawn down and not replenished.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>India&#39;s Taiwan Calculation: The Swing State That Watches Without Committing</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/indias-taiwan-calculation-the-swing-state-that-watches-without-committing/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/indias-taiwan-calculation-the-swing-state-that-watches-without-committing/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;India fought a border war with China in 1962, has had active military clashes with Chinese forces along the Line of Actual Control as recently as 2020, and maintains a territorial dispute with China that has never been formally resolved. It is a member of the Quad alongside the United States, Japan, and Australia. It has been deepening security cooperation with the United States, Japan, and Taiwan itself through informal technical and commercial channels. And yet India&amp;rsquo;s position on the Taiwan Strait remains studied ambiguity: it recognizes the People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China, does not formally recognize Taiwan, and has consistently declined to make explicit statements about what it would do in a Taiwan contingency.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kinmen and Matsu: The Offshore Islands That Taiwan Still Holds Three Miles from China</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/kinmen-and-matsu-the-offshore-islands-that-taiwan-still-holds-three-miles-from-china/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/kinmen-and-matsu-the-offshore-islands-that-taiwan-still-holds-three-miles-from-china/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Kinmen Island sits approximately 3.5 kilometers from the Chinese city of Xiamen. On a clear day, residents of Kinmen can see the skyline of a Chinese city of five million people across a strip of water narrower than the distance between Manhattan and Staten Island. Taiwan has administered Kinmen since 1949, when Nationalist forces successfully repelled a PLA amphibious assault that, if successful, might have changed the entire trajectory of the civil war&amp;rsquo;s outcome. The island has been shelled, blockaded, and fought over. It is still Taiwanese. Its continued existence as a piece of Taiwanese territory three kilometers from the Chinese mainland is one of the more remarkable geopolitical facts of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pricing the Risk: How Financial Markets Are Incorporating Taiwan Strait Probability</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/pricing-the-risk-how-financial-markets-are-incorporating-taiwan-strait-probability/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/pricing-the-risk-how-financial-markets-are-incorporating-taiwan-strait-probability/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Financial markets have been incorporating Taiwan Strait risk into asset prices with increasing explicitness over the past several years. The process is imprecise — markets price many risks simultaneously and isolating the Taiwan variable from the broader China risk premium, the global technology sector risk, and the general geopolitical uncertainty that has elevated risk premiums across multiple asset classes is methodologically challenging. What is clear is that investors who price Taiwanese assets, technology sector equities, and securities with significant Taiwan supply chain exposure are applying a discount that was not present a decade ago and that has grown as the military and political indicators have deteriorated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seoul&#39;s Silence: Why South Korea Cannot Afford to Take a Side on Taiwan</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/seouls-silence-why-south-korea-cannot-afford-to-take-a-side-on-taiwan/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/seouls-silence-why-south-korea-cannot-afford-to-take-a-side-on-taiwan/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;South Korea is an American treaty ally. It hosts 28,500 American troops, maintains one of the largest and most capable military forces in Asia, and has built its security architecture around the American alliance since the Korean War armistice of 1953. In any straightforward reading of alliance logic, Seoul should be a reliable partner in a Taiwan contingency. The reading is not straightforward. South Korea&amp;rsquo;s Taiwan position is defined by a set of structural constraints that make explicit commitment to Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s defense politically impossible in Korean domestic politics and strategically dangerous given Korea&amp;rsquo;s specific vulnerability profile.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Singapore&#39;s Tightrope: The City-State That Cannot Afford to Choose</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/singapores-tightrope-the-city-state-that-cannot-afford-to-choose/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/singapores-tightrope-the-city-state-that-cannot-afford-to-choose/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Singapore&amp;rsquo;s founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew described his country&amp;rsquo;s strategic situation as that of a small nation living in a dangerous neighborhood, whose survival depends on making itself indispensable to every major power simultaneously. His successors have maintained this framework with considerable sophistication. In the context of the Taiwan Strait, it produces a position that is carefully calibrated to avoid giving either Washington or Beijing grounds to treat Singapore as aligned with the other: Singapore maintains deep security cooperation with the United States, hosts American naval vessels at Changi Naval Base, allows American surveillance aircraft to operate from Paya Lebar Air Base, and simultaneously maintains an economic and diplomatic relationship with China that it regards as equally essential to its prosperity and security.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taiwan Builds Its Own Submarines: The Indigenous Defense Submarine Program and What It Means</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/taiwan-builds-its-own-submarines-the-indigenous-defense-submarine-program-and-what-it-means/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/taiwan-builds-its-own-submarines-the-indigenous-defense-submarine-program-and-what-it-means/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan launched its first indigenously designed and built submarine in September 2023. The vessel — named Hai Kun, or Narwhal — represented the culmination of a program that was announced in 2016, funded against significant domestic political opposition, and executed despite the near-total unavailability of normal defense industrial cooperation channels. No major submarine-building nation would sell Taiwan a complete submarine. The United States, which provides most of Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s conventional weapons, does not export submarines to any partner. Taiwan built one anyway, with foreign assistance obtained through channels that required deliberate diplomatic ambiguity from the governments whose citizens and companies were involved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taiwan Makes Its Own Weapons: The Indigenous Defense Industry and Its Strategic Logic</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/taiwan-makes-its-own-weapons-the-indigenous-defense-industry-and-its-strategic-logic/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/taiwan-makes-its-own-weapons-the-indigenous-defense-industry-and-its-strategic-logic/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan cannot always buy what it needs. Major defense suppliers limit what they will sell to avoid diplomatic friction with China. American export control legislation restricts the transfer of sensitive technologies. Treaty allies of China will not sell Taiwan weapons at all. The result of these constraints, accumulated over decades, is that Taiwan has been forced to develop a domestic defense industrial base capable of producing the systems it cannot obtain externally — and in several categories, the systems it has developed domestically are among the most important in its order of battle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Arms Pipeline: American Weapons Sales to Taiwan and the Backlog That Defines a Relationship</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-arms-pipeline-american-weapons-sales-to-taiwan-and-the-backlog-that-defines-a-relationship/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-arms-pipeline-american-weapons-sales-to-taiwan-and-the-backlog-that-defines-a-relationship/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The United States sells Taiwan weapons. This has been true since the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 mandated that the US provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character sufficient to maintain its self-defense capability. The commitment has been honored through administrations of both parties, at varying levels of political visibility and diplomatic cost. It has also produced a backlog of undelivered weapons that, as of the mid-2020s, runs to billions of dollars in contracted but unshipped equipment — a gap between what Taiwan has bought and what it has received that raises serious questions about the operational meaning of the commitment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Blockade: The Taiwan Scenario More Likely Than Invasion and More Difficult to Respond To</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-blockade-the-taiwan-scenario-more-likely-than-invasion-and-more-difficult-to-respond-to/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-blockade-the-taiwan-scenario-more-likely-than-invasion-and-more-difficult-to-respond-to/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The scenario that receives the least public attention in Taiwan Strait analysis is probably the most likely path by which Beijing would attempt to compel Taiwanese political capitulation: a maritime blockade that cuts off Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s trade without the military and political costs of a full amphibious invasion. Taiwan is an island. It imports approximately 98 percent of its energy and a significant portion of its food. Its export-oriented economy depends entirely on maritime access. A blockade that prevented ships from reaching Taiwanese ports would, within weeks, begin to produce economic and social conditions that make governance difficult and, within months, conditions that make it impossible. The strategic logic is coherent, the military execution is feasible, and the allied response problem is severe.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Chip Factories: Why TSMC Makes Taiwan the Most Economically Critical Island on Earth</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-chip-factories-why-tsmc-makes-taiwan-the-most-economically-critical-island-on-earth/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-chip-factories-why-tsmc-makes-taiwan-the-most-economically-critical-island-on-earth/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company produces the majority of the world&amp;rsquo;s most advanced logic chips. Its fabs in Hsinchu and Tainan manufacture the processors that go into every iPhone, every data center GPU, every advanced weapons guidance system, and most of the AI training infrastructure that has been built in the past three years. No other company operates at the frontier process nodes at anything close to TSMC&amp;rsquo;s volume. No other geography concentrates this much irreplaceable productive capacity in a single location. The decision by the global electronics industry to concentrate its most advanced semiconductor production on an island that a nuclear-armed neighbor claims as its own territory is the most significant strategic miscalculation of the early twenty-first century, and it has not been corrected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Democracy Variable: Why Taiwan&#39;s Political System Is the Real Subject of the Dispute</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-democracy-variable-why-taiwans-political-system-is-the-real-subject-of-the-dispute/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-democracy-variable-why-taiwans-political-system-is-the-real-subject-of-the-dispute/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan holds free elections. Its presidents are chosen by universal suffrage. Its legislature is genuinely competitive. Its media is independent, its courts function without systematic political interference, and its civil society is vibrant by any comparative measure of democratic health. These facts are not incidental to the Taiwan Strait dispute. They are the core of it. Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s democracy is an existential challenge to the political legitimacy of the People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China&amp;rsquo;s system of governance in a way that no other aspect of the Taiwan question approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Digital Front: China&#39;s Cyber Operations Against Taiwan&#39;s Infrastructure and Defense</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-digital-front-chinas-cyber-operations-against-taiwans-infrastructure-and-defense/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-digital-front-chinas-cyber-operations-against-taiwans-infrastructure-and-defense/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan is one of the most cyber-attacked places on earth. By the count maintained by its government&amp;rsquo;s cybersecurity agency, the island absorbs millions of cyberattack attempts each month, a significant portion of them attributable to Chinese state-linked actors. The volume is so high that it is used in Taiwanese government communications less as a warning than as a baseline: this is the normal operating environment. What varies is the sophistication and targeting of the attacks, which escalates during periods of political tension and which, in the event of military conflict, would transition from the persistent low-level campaign currently underway into a coordinated effort to degrade Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s military command and control, communications infrastructure, and civil society resilience simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fighter Gap: Taiwan&#39;s Air Force and the Battle It Cannot Win Conventionally</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-fighter-gap-taiwans-air-force-and-the-battle-it-cannot-win-conventionally/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-fighter-gap-taiwans-air-force-and-the-battle-it-cannot-win-conventionally/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s air force operates approximately 400 combat aircraft, including upgraded F-16A/Bs, the domestically developed Indigenous Defense Fighter, and a dwindling number of older French Mirage 2000s. Against it stands the People&amp;rsquo;s Liberation Army Air Force, which fields approximately 2,000 combat aircraft including fifth-generation J-20 stealth fighters, advanced Su-35s acquired from Russia, and large numbers of fourth-generation J-10 and J-16 multirole fighters that outperform Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s F-16s in some performance parameters. The numerical imbalance is significant. The qualitative gap, when the J-20 enters the calculation, is severe. Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s air force cannot achieve air superiority over the strait in a sustained conventional air campaign against the PLAAF.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Invasion Scenario: How the PLA Plans to Cross 110 Miles of Water</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-invasion-scenario-how-the-pla-plans-to-cross-110-miles-of-water/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-invasion-scenario-how-the-pla-plans-to-cross-110-miles-of-water/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The People&amp;rsquo;s Liberation Army has been studying the problem of amphibious assault on Taiwan for longer than most of its current officer corps has been alive. The scenario has driven force development decisions, procurement priorities, and joint operations doctrine across three decades of modernization. What the PLA has built is not a military designed to fight a generic adversary in generic conditions. It is a military designed, among other things, to cross 110 miles of water against a prepared defender while managing American intervention. Understanding what that military looks like is the starting point for any serious assessment of Taiwan Strait risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Median Line: The Invisible Boundary That Kept the Peace and Is Now Being Erased</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-median-line-the-invisible-boundary-that-kept-the-peace-and-is-now-being-erased/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-median-line-the-invisible-boundary-that-kept-the-peace-and-is-now-being-erased/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For most of the past five decades, an informal boundary ran down the center of the Taiwan Strait. Neither side formally acknowledged its existence. Neither side inscribed it in any treaty or agreement. Both sides, for most of the period between the 1950s and 2020, generally respected it: Taiwanese and Chinese military aircraft and naval vessels operated on their respective sides, and crossings were infrequent enough to be noteworthy events that required diplomatic management. The median line was a fiction that worked because both sides found it useful. China has now decided it no longer finds it useful, and the consequences of its erasure are visible in daily military operations across the strait.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Nuclear Shadow: How Atomic Weapons Shape Taiwan Strait Deterrence Without Being Used</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-nuclear-shadow-how-atomic-weapons-shape-taiwan-strait-deterrence-without-being-used/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-nuclear-shadow-how-atomic-weapons-shape-taiwan-strait-deterrence-without-being-used/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;No nuclear weapons have been used in combat since 1945. Their influence on the Taiwan Strait is nonetheless pervasive and structural. The nuclear arsenals of the United States and China — and, less directly, those of Russia, Britain, and France — shape every aspect of the conventional military competition in the strait, the escalation calculus that each party brings to crisis management, and the limits that major power decision-makers apply to their own coercive behavior. Understanding Taiwan Strait risk without understanding the nuclear dimension is understanding a building without understanding its foundations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Philippine Pivot: How Manila&#39;s Basing Decision Reshaped the Taiwan Defense Geometry</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-philippine-pivot-how-manilas-basing-decision-reshaped-the-taiwan-defense-geometry/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-philippine-pivot-how-manilas-basing-decision-reshaped-the-taiwan-defense-geometry/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The agreement reached between the United States and the Philippines in 2023, expanding American access to four additional Philippine military bases under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, was one of the most strategically significant military basing decisions in the western Pacific since the 1991 closure of Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Station. The locations matter more than the number. One of the four new sites is in Cagayan province on the northern tip of Luzon — the closest Philippine territory to Taiwan, roughly 200 miles from the southern end of the island. American forces with access to this location have a forward operating position that changes the geometry of any Taiwan contingency response.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PLAN Buildup: How China Built the World&#39;s Largest Navy and What It Means for the Strait</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-plan-buildup-how-china-built-the-worlds-largest-navy-and-what-it-means-for-the-strait/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-plan-buildup-how-china-built-the-worlds-largest-navy-and-what-it-means-for-the-strait/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The People&amp;rsquo;s Liberation Army Navy has added more ships to its fleet in the past twenty years than most countries have in their entire navies. By hull count, the PLAN is now the largest navy in the world, surpassing the United States Navy in number of surface combatants and submarines. The comparison requires qualification — American vessels are generally larger, more capable on a per-unit basis, and operated by more experienced crews in a navy with a longer tradition of sustained blue-water operations. But the qualification should not obscure the fundamental shift: China has built a navy capable of contesting American naval supremacy in the western Pacific, and it has done so on a timeline that surprised most Western defense analysts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Porcupine Strategy: Taiwan&#39;s Shift Toward Asymmetric Defense</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-porcupine-strategy-taiwans-shift-toward-asymmetric-defense/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-porcupine-strategy-taiwans-shift-toward-asymmetric-defense/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s defense establishment has been conducting an argument with itself for most of the past decade about what kind of military it needs. On one side: advocates of conventional deterrence, who want advanced fighter aircraft, large surface combatants, and the visible symbols of military capability that signal to Beijing that Taiwan can fight and to Washington that Taiwan is a serious defense partner. On the other side: advocates of asymmetric or &amp;ldquo;porcupine&amp;rdquo; defense, who argue that Taiwan cannot match PLA conventional capability in a symmetric competition and that investing in high-cost platforms that the PLA can destroy on the ground before they are ever used is strategically incoherent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Price of War: Modeling the Global Economic Cost of a Taiwan Conflict</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-price-of-war-modeling-the-global-economic-cost-of-a-taiwan-conflict/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-price-of-war-modeling-the-global-economic-cost-of-a-taiwan-conflict/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The global economic cost of a Taiwan Strait military conflict has been modeled by institutions ranging from the Rhodium Group to Bloomberg Economics to various government think tanks and war gaming centers. The estimates vary widely because the scenarios they model vary widely — a short, limited conflict produces different numbers than a prolonged blockade, which produces different numbers than a full-scale invasion with global power intervention. What the models agree on is that the numbers are very large, larger than any economic disruption since the Second World War, and large enough that they constitute an argument for prevention that is separate from any moral or political case for Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s defense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reservist Problem: Taiwan&#39;s Effort to Build a Military That Can Actually Fight</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-reservist-problem-taiwans-effort-to-build-a-military-that-can-actually-fight/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-reservist-problem-taiwans-effort-to-build-a-military-that-can-actually-fight/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s military has a personnel problem that its equipment purchases cannot solve. The active force — approximately 165,000 personnel across the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines — is designed for a conventional defense posture that the island&amp;rsquo;s strategic situation may not support. The reserve force, nominally numbering in the millions, is trained to a standard that multiple independent assessments have described as inadequate for the dispersed, mobile operations that Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s actual defense requirements would demand. The gap between the military on paper and the military that can fight is the most urgent operational readiness problem Taiwan faces, and it is one that requires sustained political will rather than procurement decisions to address.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rocket Force: China&#39;s Missile Arsenal and What It Can Do to Taiwan in the First Hours</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-rocket-force-chinas-missile-arsenal-and-what-it-can-do-to-taiwan-in-the-first-hours/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-rocket-force-chinas-missile-arsenal-and-what-it-can-do-to-taiwan-in-the-first-hours/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The PLA Rocket Force — elevated to service branch status in 2015 from the former Second Artillery Corps — is the component of Chinese military power that most directly shapes Taiwan Strait risk assessments. Its inventory of conventional ballistic and cruise missiles, built over thirty years of investment that accelerated after the 1996 Taiwan Strait crisis demonstrated American carrier leverage, is the primary instrument through which China can threaten Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s military infrastructure, its population centers, and the American and allied forces that would respond to any attack. Understanding what the Rocket Force can do in the first hours of a conflict is prerequisite to understanding every other aspect of Taiwan Strait security.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ryukyu Chain: Japan&#39;s Southern Islands and the Geography of Taiwan&#39;s Defense</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-ryukyu-chain-japans-southern-islands-and-the-geography-of-taiwans-defense/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-ryukyu-chain-japans-southern-islands-and-the-geography-of-taiwans-defense/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Stretching from Kyushu southwestward toward Taiwan, the Ryukyu island chain forms a natural barrier between the East China Sea and the Philippine Sea. The chain includes Okinawa — site of the largest American military concentration in the western Pacific — and continues through progressively smaller islands to the Yaeyama group, whose southernmost point lies less than 75 miles from Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s northeastern tip. This geography is not coincidental to the Taiwan question. It is central to it. Any Chinese military operation in the Taiwan Strait must account for the Ryukyu chain, and any American or Japanese response to such an operation would use the chain as its primary operating framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Senkaku Overlap: How Japan&#39;s Island Dispute Entangles With Taiwan&#39;s Security</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-senkaku-overlap-how-japans-island-dispute-entangles-with-taiwans-security/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-senkaku-overlap-how-japans-island-dispute-entangles-with-taiwans-security/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyu Islands in China — are eight uninhabited islands and rocks administered by Japan in the East China Sea, approximately 170 kilometers northeast of Taiwan and 330 kilometers west of Okinawa. Japan claims sovereignty. China claims sovereignty. Taiwan also claims sovereignty, though Taiwanese governments have generally handled the claim with less assertiveness than Beijing. The islands have no permanent population and no inherent economic value beyond the fisheries and potential hydrocarbon resources in the surrounding waters. Their strategic value lies entirely in their position: they sit at the junction of Japan&amp;rsquo;s Ryukyu chain and Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s northern approaches, and whoever controls them controls observation and potentially military positions that are relevant to both the East China Sea competition and the Taiwan Strait contingency.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Trade Trap: Cross-Strait Economic Integration and Its Strategic Implications</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-trade-trap-cross-strait-economic-integration-and-its-strategic-implications/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/the-trade-trap-cross-strait-economic-integration-and-its-strategic-implications/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s largest trading partner is the People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China. By a significant margin. The two sides of a strait that are separated by competing political claims, opposing military forces, and seventy-five years of antagonism trade more with each other than Taiwan trades with the United States and Japan combined. This fact sits at the center of the Taiwan strategic problem in a way that military analysis consistently underweights: the economic integration that has developed between Taiwan and China since the 1990s has created dependencies that shape the behavior of Taiwanese businesses, the political calculations of Taiwanese voters, and the investment decisions of multinational companies with operations on both sides.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vietnam&#39;s Angle: The South China Sea Dispute and Its Connection to Taiwan&#39;s Security</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/vietnams-angle-the-south-china-sea-dispute-and-its-connection-to-taiwans-security/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/vietnams-angle-the-south-china-sea-dispute-and-its-connection-to-taiwans-security/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Vietnam fought China in 1979. The two-month border war, triggered by Vietnam&amp;rsquo;s invasion of Cambodia to remove the Chinese-backed Khmer Rouge government, cost tens of thousands of lives on both sides and ended without a clear military result. Vietnam held its positions. China withdrew. The war left a deep imprint on Vietnamese strategic culture: the understanding that China is a permanent neighbor with permanent interests in Vietnamese subordination, and that resistance — rather than accommodation — is the posture that Vietnamese sovereignty requires.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What the War Games Say: The Simulations That Are Shaping Taiwan Contingency Planning</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/what-the-war-games-say-the-simulations-that-are-shaping-taiwan-contingency-planning/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/what-the-war-games-say-the-simulations-that-are-shaping-taiwan-contingency-planning/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Center for Strategic and International Studies published a major wargame analysis of the Taiwan Strait in January 2023. It ran 24 iterations of a Chinese invasion scenario, varying assumptions about Chinese military capability, American intervention, Japanese participation, and Taiwanese defense posture. The headline finding — that the United States and its allies could likely defeat a Chinese invasion but at very high cost — made international news. The details of the analysis were more nuanced and more alarming than the headline suggested. Understanding what the wargames actually show, and what they cannot show, is prerequisite to understanding the current state of Taiwan contingency planning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Owns the Strait: The Legal Status of Taiwan&#39;s Waters and Why It Matters Now</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/who-owns-the-strait-the-legal-status-of-taiwans-waters-and-why-it-matters-now/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/who-owns-the-strait-the-legal-status-of-taiwans-waters-and-why-it-matters-now/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The legal status of the Taiwan Strait has become an active diplomatic flashpoint rather than a settled background condition. The United States and its allies assert that the strait is an international waterway subject to the freedom of navigation that applies to straits used for international navigation. China asserts that the strait is Chinese internal waters, through which foreign military vessels do not have an automatic right of transit. These positions are irreconcilable, and the competition to establish which one is treated as authoritative by state behavior is a current, active dimension of the Taiwan Strait competition that operates below the threshold of military confrontation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Xi&#39;s Timeline: Reading Chinese Intentions From Statements, Structures, and Force Development</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/xis-timeline-reading-chinese-intentions-from-statements-structures-and-force-development/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/xis-timeline-reading-chinese-intentions-from-statements-structures-and-force-development/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The question of when — not whether — China might attempt military action against Taiwan has become the organizing analytical question of western Pacific security. It is asked because Chinese leaders, most explicitly Xi Jinping, have provided a series of statements and deadlines that create at least a public framework for reading Chinese intentions. That framework is ambiguous enough that analysts reach different conclusions from the same data, which is itself informative: ambiguity about the timeline is probably a feature of Chinese strategy rather than a gap in its communication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASE Holdings Honors Top Suppliers at Annual Supplier Day, Eyes AI and HPC Demand Surge</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/ase-holdings-honors-top-suppliers-at-annual-supplier-day-eyes-ai-and-hpc-demand-surge/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/ase-holdings-honors-top-suppliers-at-annual-supplier-day-eyes-ai-and-hpc-demand-surge/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. held its annual Supplier Day in Taichung on April 24, recognizing outstanding partners across its subsidiary network — ASE, SPIL, and USI — and presenting awards to the top performers of 2025. More than 100 supplier representatives attended the event, themed around the concept of Innovation of Synergy.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The ceremony was as much a strategic briefing as an awards function. COO Dr. Tien Wu framed the moment plainly: global semiconductor revenue is projected to surpass one trillion dollars by 2026, driven by AI and high-performance computing demand. He pointed to edge applications — drones, robotics — as the next growth vector beyond cloud data centers, and positioned Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s integrated semiconductor ecosystem as structurally well-suited to sustain its global role. The subtext, in a period of supply chain fragmentation and geopolitical pressure, was resilience through depth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DFI Expands Taiwan Manufacturing Capacity for Edge AI and Industrial Automation</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/dfi-expands-taiwan-manufacturing-capacity-for-edge-ai-and-industrial-automation/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/dfi-expands-taiwan-manufacturing-capacity-for-edge-ai-and-industrial-automation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;DFI, the Taiwan-based embedded and industrial computing manufacturer founded in 1981, announced on April 22 an expansion of its Taiwan manufacturing operations intended to meet rising demand from Edge AI deployments, industrial automation systems, and adjacent industrial applications.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The expansion targets two specific capacity constraints that have emerged as Edge AI transitions from proof-of-concept to production-scale deployment. DFI is adding approximately 25% more PCBA capacity and six new system assembly lines across 2026, with the stated goal of improving lead-time flexibility and reducing friction in large-scale rollouts. The move reflects a broader shift in customer priorities: compute performance alone is no longer the dominant procurement criterion. Supply assurance, lifecycle stability, and deployment reliability have become decisive factors, particularly for operators running equipment in demanding or continuous-use environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jensen Huang to Keynote COMPUTEX 2026 as NVIDIA Pushes AI Ecosystem Vision in Taipei</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/jensen-huang-to-keynote-computex-2026-as-nvidia-pushes-ai-ecosystem-vision-in-taipei/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/jensen-huang-to-keynote-computex-2026-as-nvidia-pushes-ai-ecosystem-vision-in-taipei/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;TAITRA has confirmed that NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang will deliver the keynote address at &lt;a href=&#34;https://technologyconference.com/computex-2026-june-2-5-taipei-nangang-exhibition-center-taipei-world-trade-center/&#34;&gt;COMPUTEX 2026&lt;/a&gt;, making official what had been widely anticipated: Taipei will once again serve as the opening frame for NVIDIA&amp;rsquo;s mid-year narrative push. The presentation takes place at the Taipei Music Center on June 1 at 11 a.m. Taiwan Time — Sunday, May 31 at 8 p.m. Pacific — and will be livestreamed globally through NVIDIA&amp;rsquo;s GTC Taipei keynote page, with a replay available afterward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Carrier Liaoning Transits Taiwan Strait for First Time Since Late 2024</title>
      <link>https://taiwanstrait.com/chinese-carrier-liaoning-transits-taiwan-strait-for-first-time-since-late-2024/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://taiwanstrait.com/chinese-carrier-liaoning-transits-taiwan-strait-for-first-time-since-late-2024/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning sailed through the Taiwan Strait on Monday, April 20, according to Taiwan&amp;rsquo;s defence ministry — marking the first passage of a carrier through the waterway since late last year.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The transit is a deliberate signal. The strait, roughly 180 kilometers wide at its narrowest, is one of the most politically loaded stretches of water in the world. Beijing claims it as internal waters; Washington and Taipei reject that framing and maintain freedom-of-navigation as a standing principle. Sending a carrier through it is not a routine patrol — it is a message, timed and calculated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
